Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?

  Sierra Magazine
  November/December 2008
Table of Contents
Ice Manliness Cometh
A Six-Dog-Power Engine
I (Heart) Snowshoeing
Skiing Yellowstone
Welcome Back to the World
Rotten Fish Tales
Big Fun in the Green Zone
Hey Mr. Green
Comfort Zone
Mixed Media
Last Words
Sierra Archives
About Sierra
Internships at Sierra
Advertising Information
Current Advertisers

Sierra Magazine

Printer-friendly format
click here to tell a friend


Good Day, Sunshine

All technologies under the sun.

When most people think about solar energy, they picture photovoltaic panels on top of someone’s cabin in the woods. Thousands of homes are powered this way, and not just cabins (George W. Bush’s Crawford ranch house, for one). But while we’re waiting for photovoltaics (PV) to become commercially viable, other solar technologies may be much closer.

"The problem with solar is how to get significant quantities of energy out of it," says Rich Ferguson, energy chair of Sierra Club California. Despite substantial improvements in PV cells, they remain extremely expensive, delivering electricity at about 30 cents a kilowatt. (Wind power, by comparison, is down to 4 cents a kilowatt, about the same as modern natural-gas plant.)

But there’s more to solar power than PV. One of the most promising approaches to large-scale solar-energy production is called "solar thermal," in which huge arrays of mirrored, parabolic troughs focus sunbeams on central tubes, heating oil to 750 degrees to drive steam turbines. "If this country is going to get serious about solar power," says Ferguson, "it’s going to look more like this than PV."

Since 1985, solar thermal plants in California’s Mojave Desert have been generating 354 megawatts at a cost of about 15 cents a kilowatt-hour. The price could go much lower, supporters say, as more plants are built. "This is the most cost-effective form of solar energy today," says Gary Bailey, West Coast head of Duke Solar, which is seeking to build a 300- to 500-megawatt solar facility in the Mojave, and another in Nevada. The holdup, he says, is lack of demand. "We need long-term contracts."

While the solar trough is the most developed of alternative solar systems, two others are jockeying for position. One is the "power tower," in which thousands of heliostats, or movable mirrors, beam sunlight up to a central tower, powering steam turbines. Other innovators are working on a similar design powering the elusive "Stirling engine," a piston engine driven not by internal combustion but by heat from an outside source–for instance, by the sun.

Third on the solar smorgasbord is the dish system, in which parabolic mirrors focus sunlight onto a receiver (they look like satellite dishes) to run a Stirling engine. The technical challenge with this method is finding materials that can withstand temperatures well above 1,000 degrees.

Even so, enthusiasts insist that the main impediment to major advancements in solar energy is lack of political will. "Why do people always think in the short term?" grouses Duke’s Bailey. "When you sign up a new natural-gas plant, you don’t know how much gas is going to cost in ten years, or even if you’ll have a supply. But we have the only stable energy source there is; there’s no fuel-cost escalation in the sun." –Paul Rauber

Up to Top

HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club