Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?
Sierra Main
In This Section
  July/August 2003 Issue
  FEATURES: Global Warming
The Melting Point
High Tide in Tuvalu
Bobbing in the Big Apple
Two Views From the East
Interview: Biologist Michael Soulé
Green-Collar Workers
How Did the Grizzly Cross the Road?
Ways & Means
One Small Step
Lay of the Land
Good Going
Food For Thought
Hidden Life
The Sierra Club Bulletin
Grassroots Update
Mixed Media
Last Words
Sierra Archives
About Sierra
Internships at Sierra
Advertising Information
Current Advertisers

Sierra Magazine

Printer-friendly format
click here to tell a friend

Lay of the Land

Wind-power Politics | Roads to Nowhere | Consumer-product pollutants | Columbia River Swimmer | Pinstripes Against Pollution | UNESCO's Danger List | Bold Strokes | WWatch | Updates

Blowing Hot and Cold

Are some places too beautiful for wind power?

Wind Turbines
Careful siting can make offshore wind turbines, like these at Tuno Knob, Denmark, sources of national pride rather than strife.
Photo by Greenpeace/Davison
On Cape Cod this spring, wind-power politics were played out, appropriately enough, on the air. A television ad by Greenpeace USA featured oil-soaked ducks, fiery tanker wrecks, and spewing industrial towers set to menacing music. "Why have this," asks the narrator, "when we could have this?" Segue to white-clad engineers assembling wind turbines to upbeat rock ’n’ roll. Sleek windmill blades turn slowly in a peach-colored ocean sunset: "Clean, Safe, Reliable Wind Power."

But in another ad, sponsored by a coalition of local communities and fishing and tourism groups called Save Our Sound, Walter Cronkite warns of a private wind-power developer’s plan to build an "industrial energy complex" across 24 square miles of public water visible from Nantucket, Martha’s Vineyard, and Cape Cod. "Our national treasures should be off-limits to industrialization," he says.

Wind power is one of the world’s fastest-growing energy sources, but some of the prime spots for its development are in the scenic shallows of the Atlantic coast. In this case, a company called Cape Wind wants to erect 130 towering turbines as close as five miles from the famous wisps of land that have come to define the natural beauty of New England. The turbines would generate roughly 170 pollution-free megawatts–enough to power three-quarters of Cape Cod–but they’d also alter the ocean views and yachting experience of some of the wealthiest people in the country, among them Cronkite and the Kennedy family.

"I’m pro-wind power," says Isaac Rosen of Save Our Sound. "The question is, how do you responsibly site power plants, particularly when dealing with the private use of a public resource?"

All agree that Congress should establish standards for offshore windmills, much as it has done with offshore oil wells. Yet, argues Seth Kaplan of the Conservation Law Foundation, "the need to get off our chairs and take some action on greenhouse gases is so intense that we have to make use of the tools we have available." The Cape Wind site is one of only three on the Atlantic coast that are both shallow and windy enough; the turbines will be small on the horizon as seen from shore, and their lights shielded. "Aesthetics are important," Kaplan says, "but we can’t lose sight of the bigger picture." –Margaret Knox

Up to Top

HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club