Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?
  Sierra Magazine
  January/February 2007
Table of Contents
Energizing America
Can Coal Be Clean?
Negawatt Power
Why Not Nukes?
The Birds and the Breeze
The Fix
Decoder: Corn-Fed Cars
The Watched Photographer
Ways & Means
One Small Step
Lay of the Land
Good Going
The Green Life
Hey Mr. Green
Sierra Club Bulletin
Sierra Archives
About Sierra
Internships at Sierra
Advertising Information
Current Advertisers

Sierra Magazine
click here to print this article! click here to tell a friend
The Birds and the Breeze
Making wind power safe for wildlife
by Frances Cerra Whittelsey
January/February 2007

Siting wind farms far from avian flight paths can greatly reduce bird kills; taller turbines with fewer arms also help.
ALTAMONT, CALIFORNIA, gave wind farms a bad reputation. At least 22,000 birds, including some 400 golden eagles, have collided with wind turbines (or been electrocuted by power lines) there, leading some to call the machines "Cuisinarts of the air."

Had studies been done before the 5,400-turbine facility was built in the 1980s, they would have shown that the Altamont Pass is an important migration route and wintering area for raptors. Better placement of wind farms and individual turbines is key to reducing bird fatalities. "We support appropriately sited wind power projects," insists Jeff Miller, a spokesperson for the Center for Biological Diversity, which is suing for restitution for bird deaths at Altamont. Laurie Jodziewicz, representing the American Wind Energy Association, says, "It's standard practice now to do bird studies prior to construction." Jodziewicz also notes that today's turbines are taller--above the flight paths of many birds--and more efficient than earlier models. Over the next decade at Altamont, one new turbine will replace every 15 old ones, producing the same amount of power.

To help minimize risks at its proposed 140-megawatt wind farm off the south shore of Long Island, New York, the Long Island Power Authority conducted an environmental assessment. The review eliminated sites near inlets and at the island's tip at Montauk Point because of high concentrations of birds. Pending a final environmental impact statement, local conservation groups have so far supported building the project 3.6 miles off the popular Jones Beach State Park. Some residents, however, remain opposed on aesthetic grounds.

Bats too have been hurt by wind turbines, but mitigation studies began only in 2005, a year after the discovery that thousands had died at wind farms in the mountains of West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Work is now under way to find a means to warn bats away from the spinning blades.

Efforts to make turbines safer for birds seem to be working. According to a 2003 study of 4,700 turbines located outside California, each killed 2.3 birds per year. That's a tiny number compared with the hundreds of millions of birds that fall prey to cats every year, or the 4 million, at minimum, that collide with communication towers. And it pales in comparison to the number of birds and other creatures that would be killed by catastrophic global warming.

The map above was developed by the Nature Conservancy to encourage responsible wind power in Oklahoma. (This fragment shows the state's panhandle.) It highlights areas with strong winds and ecologically sensitive habitat. Talk about sensitive: Endangered prairie chickens aren't at risk of flying into turbines because they shy away from tall objects that might serve as raptor perches. For an interactive version of the entire map, visit

Map courtesy of the Nature Conservancy
Photo courtesy of Warren Gretz/DOE/NREL

Up to Top

HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club